Blake Lively’s Reaction to Taylor Swift’s Engagement Will Surprise You!
In a twist no one saw coming, Blake Lively—once one of Taylor Swift’s most steadfast friends—has responded to Swift’s engagement announcement not with a celebration, but with silence.
A Notable Absence Amid the Celebration
Taylor Swift’s engagement to NFL superstar Travis Kelce lit up headlines when she announced it via a heartfelt Instagram post on August 26, 2025. Amid the outpouring of congratulatory messages, one name conspicuously absent was Blake Lively, once considered a close confidante of the pop icon Vanity Fair+15News.com.au+15Marie Claire UK+15The Times of India+1.
Soon after, whispers turned into headlines: Lively “didn’t reach out” and “isn’t going to,” as revealed by insiders, with sources emphasizing, “this isn’t the time… she’s got bigger fish to fry” Page Six+2Koimoi+2.
From Birthday Overshadowing to The Silence That Speaks
The timing of Swift’s engagement announcement—coming just a day after Lively’s birthday on August 25—added fuel to speculation. Fans online have been quick to suggest this was more than coincidence: “Taylor announcing her engagement on Blake Lively’s birthday … pretty much solidifies that she cut that friendship off if u ask me” People.com+15Koimoi+15The Times of India+15.
Koimoi summarized the drama: Swift’s announcement overshadowed Lively’s birthday, and her lack of acknowledgment only intensified rumors of a deep fallout Koimoi.
Digging Deeper: Legal Strife as the Source of the Rift
Behind the surprising silence lies a tangled web of legal conflict. In December 2024, Blake Lively filed a high-profile lawsuit against her It Ends With Us co-star and director, Justin Baldoni, accusing him of sexual harassment and other serious charges HELLO!+15PEDESTRIAN.TV+15People.com+15.
Baldoni responded with a countersuit alleging defamation and extortion, naming Lively’s husband Ryan Reynolds and even referencing Taylor Swift, calling Swift one of Lively’s “most trusted partners” or “dragons” who protected her Vanity Fair+5People.com+5Page Six+5.
The drama escalated when Swift was subpoenaed to testify—a development her team strongly denounced, accusing the move of seeking tabloid attention. The subpoena was quickly dropped Yahoo+2PEDESTRIAN.TV+2.
The Fallout: Burned Bridges
According to sources, Swift felt “betrayed” and “exploited” by Lively’s legal use of her name—believing that the “dragon” reference was more about clout than actual friendship Koimoi+5Marie Claire UK+5News.com.au+5.
By mid-2025, outlets like People reported that Swift and Lively were no longer speaking. While some suggested they were attempting to mend fences, their friendship clearly wasn’t what it once was New York Post+15People.com+15Yahoo+15.
By late August—the time of the engagement news—reports confirmed Lively’s complete disengagement. “She doesn’t talk about Taylor at all,” said an insider. She’s not expecting to be invited to the wedding and has seemingly accepted the end of the friendship The Times of India+4Page Six+4Koimoi+4.
Swift’s Side of the Story
While Swift remains publicly focused on her engagement and career, with no comment on Lively or the legal fallout, sources close to her say she wants nothing to do with the drama YahooPage SixPeople.com.
What Does It All Mean?
-
A friendship reduced to silence. Lively’s lack of acknowledgment is a stark departure from the mutual support that once defined their relationship—she directed one of Swift’s music videos and their families are deeply intertwined HELLO!Yahoo.
-
The real spark? Legal conflict: Lively’s lawsuit inadvertently drew Swift into a murky dispute.
-
No reconciliation in sight—for now. Sources say the damage is deep and likely permanent Marie Claire UK.
Surprising? Absolutely.
You’d expect a ripple of excitement or at least acknowledgment from Lively. Instead, the silence speaks volumes—displaying how even the strongest bonds can crumble under the pressure of unexpected real-world drama.
